<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>bangpath &#187; Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bangpath.com/category/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bangpath.com</link>
	<description>thoughts for thinking people</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:31:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Musings on the New Emperor</title>
		<link>http://www.bangpath.com/2010/07/08/musings-on-the-new-emperor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bangpath.com/2010/07/08/musings-on-the-new-emperor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>t0mmy berg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bangpath.com/?p=261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We used to take it on faith that an independent Judicial Branch and an independent Fed were important principles forming part of the foundation of trust in American institutions.  So it is very disturbing to see the choreographed events taking place this past year in American politics.  First we had the President of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We used to take it on faith that an independent Judicial Branch and an independent Fed were important principles forming part of the foundation of trust in American institutions.  So it is very disturbing to see the choreographed events taking place this past year in American politics.  First we had the President of the United States in his State of the Union address, one of the most visible forums in politics, excoriating the Supreme Court, a co-equal branch of government, for one of its rulings (and one having to do with free political speech no less).  Also note that it was a forum in which the accused did not have a possibility of replying to the slight.  More recently, somehow the &#8220;President&#8221; had the Fed Chief, Helicopter Ben Bernanke at his side in the White House to back him up on what a wonderful job he and the Demunists were doing with the economy.  I believe it was the first time a Fed Chief has been brought to heel in such a way, ever.  Bernanke could not even bring himself to raise his eyes.  He was supremely uncomfortanle, and so he should have been.  Such a display of course begs the question of the Fed&#8217;s independence from political pressure.  There is some correlation here with Gold breaching 1200/ounce in dollar terms and surpassing the price of the S&#038;P500 index.  </p>
<p>For some on the left the answer is to give Obama the dictatorial powers he craves so he can &#8220;fix&#8221; our problems with his omniscient set of advisers (who have the least real-world experience of any set of presidential advisers ever).  One of these was Woody Allen I admit but one was Thomas Friedman, a supposedly serious journalist with the NY Times.  Yeah, great idea.   Is it any wonder that we have an ongoing crisis of confidence?  Or that the public approval of its legislators is at its lowest ebb?  Things will turn up once confidence returns.  Confidence will return once these clowns (we actually elected an actual clown to the Senate from my home state, and from my own high school) are sent packing and the ratio of those who are minimally serious and competent in Washington rises above the 10% or so it numbers currently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bangpath.com/2010/07/08/musings-on-the-new-emperor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar Should Resign Over BP Comments</title>
		<link>http://www.bangpath.com/2010/06/11/secretary-of-the-interior-ken-salazar-should-resign-over-bp-comments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bangpath.com/2010/06/11/secretary-of-the-interior-ken-salazar-should-resign-over-bp-comments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 18:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>t0mmy berg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bangpath.com/?p=249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Yesterday it was reported that Ken Salazar, the Secretary of the Interior of the United States actually said that he would ask BP to repay the salaries of any workers laid off because of the six month moratorium on deepwater exploratory drilling imposed by the government.  So let me get this straight.  BP cuts some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img title="Ken Salazar Image" src="http://www.bangpath.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/250px-Ken_Salazar_official_DOI_portrait.jpg" alt="Ken Salazar Image" width="250" height="327" align="right" hspace="3" vspace="3" style="padding-left:5px" /><br />
Yesterday it was reported that <a title="Wikipedia on Ken Salazar" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Salazar">Ken Salazar, the Secretary of the Interior of the United States</a> actually said that he would ask BP to repay the salaries of any workers laid off because of the six month moratorium on deepwater exploratory drilling imposed by the government.  So let me get this straight.  BP cuts some corners and suffers a blowout of the well they were drilling in deep water which under tremendous pressure is now spewing much oil into the Gulf of Mexico and fouling the coast, affecting the livelihoods of many people.  This much we know and I think everyone would agree that BP should pay for the effect they are having on peoples livelihoods as they are impacted by the presence of the oil.  And as a result the United States government imposes a halt on further drilling in order to create new regulations or something so other blowouts do not happen.  As if the operators of other rigs are not already reviewing their operations to avoid the fate of BP, which is going to fork over tens if not hundreds of billons in revenue to pay for their spill.  The moratorium is going to result in the layoffs of thousands of people working on these rigs.</p>
<p>Now comes the Secretary of he Interior, a cabinet official of the United States, appointed by the President.  He apparently suggests in all seriousness that BP pay the salaries of those laid off because the US Government overreacts and stops all drilling?  This is so far outside what would be reasonable, so absolutely outrageous in its audacity and idiocy, that Ken Salazar should resign immediately or be fired by the President.  You just cannot make this stuff up.  One more example of the horrifying lack of seriousness and gravitas of those who represent the interests of the polity in Washington.  To the right is a picture of this buffoon.</p>
<p>Of course what I have heard no one mention is that one of the great tragedies of this blown well is that we are losing all this oil!  Jim Cramer was just on saying that his &#8220;oil people&#8221; are telling him this crude deposit is one of the greatest finds of all time.  That is why the pressure is unmanageable.  And it is all flowing out into the Gulf at this point.  What a waste.
</p>
<p><br clear="all" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bangpath.com/2010/06/11/secretary-of-the-interior-ken-salazar-should-resign-over-bp-comments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jobs!  Jobs?</title>
		<link>http://www.bangpath.com/2010/05/20/jobs-jobs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bangpath.com/2010/05/20/jobs-jobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 17:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>t0mmy berg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Competitiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bangpath.com/?p=231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I always sort of a grimly chuckle when I hear a politician on the tube say something like  &#8220;Our focus is now entirely on creating jobs.&#8221;  Politicians may be just about the stupidest creatures on our shared Earth, but they do know one thing.  When people feel economically insecure, they tend to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always sort of a grimly chuckle when I hear a politician on the tube say something like  &#8220;Our focus is now entirely on creating jobs.&#8221;  Politicians may be just about the stupidest creatures on our shared Earth, but they do know one thing.  When people feel economically insecure, they tend to vote against those currently holding the levers of power, whether they are responsible or not for the state of affairs leading to the insecurity.  So when they say they are focused on jobs, they are really saying they are focused on getting reelected.</p>
<p>In a market economy, it is not the responsibility of the government to provide jobs (a statement with which nearly everyone agrees, freaks from places like moveon.org notwithstanding).  It is the responsibility of the government to provide an environment in which the people of the country can go about their business, which will collaterally result in creating jobs.  So the government takes care of the national defense and provides an impartial system for the adjudication of disputes, which in our country is predicated on applying the same set of rules to similarly situated people similarly (unless you are a demunist, in which case the rules get applied depending on whether you are in one of their identified support groups or not, the nub of identity politics).  This is something that statists, redistributionists and collectivists like Barack Obama and his Demunistic brethren fail to understand.  The more they do to create jobs, the less likely it is that we will have sustainable job growth.  They are destroyers.  They destroy.  If they really wanted to see jobs created, the best thing they can do is get the government the hell out of the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bangpath.com/2010/05/20/jobs-jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>El Presidente Believes His Own Bullsh*t</title>
		<link>http://www.bangpath.com/2010/03/25/el-presidente-believes-his-own-bullsht/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bangpath.com/2010/03/25/el-presidente-believes-his-own-bullsht/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>t0mmy berg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bangpath.com/?p=218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After consigning the American experiment to the ash heap of history by arrogantly and brazenly cramming government control of health care down all of our throats against our will, Mr Obama is really feeling his oats.   Reuters reports of El Presidente:
President Barack Obama dared Republicans on Thursday to try to repeal his newly signed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After consigning the American experiment to the ash heap of history by arrogantly and brazenly cramming government control of health care down all of our throats against our will, Mr Obama is really feeling his oats.   <a title="Obummer" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN2522952320100325">Reuters reports</a> of El Presidente:</p>
<blockquote><p><span id="articleText">President Barack Obama dared Republicans on Thursday to try to repeal his newly signed healthcare law&#8230; </span><span id="articleText">I don&#8217;t believe the American people are going to put the insurance industry back in the driver&#8217;s seat. We&#8217;ve been there already. We&#8217;re not going back.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span>Riiiggghhht.  Because all of those 85% of people who are satisfied with their current health insurance arrangement would rather have the government in the driver&#8217;s seat than their insurance company.  A sick and twisted mind it is.   He actually thinks that it is preferable to have your health care dictated by the government, against whom there is no appeal and who wields the sovereign right of extortion (it is called taxation, and is in the end backed up by force), than a private company that you can fire or sue.  Simply amazing.  My mouth just gapes open when I hear this kind of stuff.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span>In a related bit of news reported <a title="Obummer" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1260195/U-S-healthcare-reform-14-rebel-states-sue.html">here</a>,  a Harris Poll, aptly critiqued for its methodological shoddiness by James Taranto of the Wall Street Journal <a title="Obummer" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704094104575143713101937570.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_MIDDLETopOpinion">here</a>, apparently finds 25% of Republicans think Obama is the AntiChrist.  I am not a Republican, though I have never voted for a Demunist in any election for any office, and I never will.  I also do not believe there is an AntiChrist.  But if there were an AntiChrist, I think Mr. Obama might just fit the bill.  Certainly he will be remembered that way once the whole house of cards comes crashing down because he threw the wet towel of state on top of it.<br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bangpath.com/2010/03/25/el-presidente-believes-his-own-bullsht/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Republicans Should Fear Thursdays Health Care Summit</title>
		<link>http://www.bangpath.com/2010/02/21/why-republicans-should-fear-thursdays-health-care-summit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bangpath.com/2010/02/21/why-republicans-should-fear-thursdays-health-care-summit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 20:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>t0mmy berg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bangpath.com/?p=209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In watching the Sunday talking head shows today, I saw some footage of Mitt Romney saying something foolish at the recent CPAC dinner.  He said that the Stimulus Package passed by Democrats in 2009 &#8220;added not one net new job to the American economy&#8221;.  Hmm.  I know what he was trying to say.  But what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In watching the Sunday talking head shows today, I saw some footage of Mitt Romney saying something foolish at the recent CPAC dinner.  He said that the Stimulus Package passed by Democrats in 2009 &#8220;added not one net new job to the American economy&#8221;.  Hmm.  I know what he was trying to say.  But what he said was something else.  What he was trying to say and should have said was something like &#8220;The Stimulus Bill may have produced some jobs, and we are happy for those families who are now employed.  But the cost per job for each of those jobs, which will be paid for by American Taxpayers, was much more than what the employed people will benefit.  And in the end, the economy as a whole will be less well off than if those jobs had been provided by the private economy because they did not have to pay the taxes it cost to create those government provided jobs.  The economy would be better off, on the whole, if the money was left in the private economy rather than washed through the inefficient hands of government.&#8221;  Of course with some more wordsmithing I am sure this could be made more pithy.</p>
<p>Instead he said that no jobs were created.  Now the average American will look at a statement like that and say to themselves, &#8220;um, obviously it did create some jobs.  This must be one of those nay-saying Republicans (like the media says) saying something demonstrably untrue that anyone can see at a glance is probably false.  So I guess we cannot trust those guys either.&#8221;  And of course the Left will run with such a statement to prove that Republicans are lying idiots.</p>
<p>Which brings us to Thursday&#8217;s trap setup.  Obviously Obama is trying to lay a trap to make Republicans look bad on Health Care.  If Republicans go into it with thoughtless language like Romney used at CPAC then they are going to get their hats handed to them and blunt the force they have going into the mid-terms in 8 months.  Hopefully whoever winds up going will take a page from the recent editorial by Newt Gingrich, which laid out a number of ideas for handling health care reform, and be well-prepared enough on why the Left&#8217;s ideas are dangerous not to sink the party&#8217;s fortunes this fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bangpath.com/2010/02/21/why-republicans-should-fear-thursdays-health-care-summit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Does America Ignore the Obvious Problem with Entitlements?</title>
		<link>http://www.bangpath.com/2010/02/17/why-does-america-ignore-the-obvious-problem-with-entitlements/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bangpath.com/2010/02/17/why-does-america-ignore-the-obvious-problem-with-entitlements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>t0mmy berg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bangpath.com/?p=203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With all the wailing and gnashing of teeth over the Federal Budget our Dear Leader the Obamanator proposed recently, you occasionally hear the solution mentioned but it is rarely discussed and Congress turns it&#8217;s back (for example by voting unanimously to keep entitlements off the table when considering how not to bankrupt the country).  It [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all the wailing and gnashing of teeth over the Federal Budget our Dear Leader the Obamanator proposed recently, you occasionally hear the solution mentioned but it is rarely discussed and Congress turns it&#8217;s back (for example by voting unanimously to keep entitlements off the table when considering how not to bankrupt the country).  It seems to me the solution is just plain obvious.  When Social Security was conceived, the government was assuming the obligation to pay some piddling amount for what was an expectation of something like 2 years per person.  This was because the average life expectancy at the time was about 2 years more than the age at which the government would start paying benefits. A similar dynamic is at work with Medicare.</p>
<p>In the meantime, America&#8217;s  great medical entrepreneurs and doctors and scientists (some from outside America too) have figured out how to extend our lives to the point where we are now living not 2 &#8211; but 15, 20 or 30 years past the point where the government starts paying benefits.   So we need to either decrease life expectancies, which seems rather evil, or move the retirement age out to be in line with our ever-increasing life spans.  The blunder the government made at program inception (and one they seem to make with every program in one way or another, do they not ever learn anything?) was not to index the age at which benefits start to life expectancy.  It is just as stupid as not indexing other benefits for inflation.  The Germans have already taken steps to address this.  Are we less capable than Germany?  The obvious solution is to move the retirement age out to be more in line with increased life expectancy.  Is that so hard?  See <a title="Life Expectancy" href="http://www.actuaries.org/Boston2008/Papers/IPT5_Turner.pdf">here for a discussion</a> of how some countries have done this.</p>
<p>Instead we have Demunists trying to take over health care which will have the nearly immediate effect of reducing life expectancies.  While that might help in the long run, it is not the optimal solution I would submit.  And it does not address the other driver of our entitlement crisis, the fact that health costs rise faster than economic growth.  It actually makes it worse.  The country senses this.  Is it any wonder that Commocrats will get wiped up in the fall elections?  Not that I trust the Republicans to do the right thing.   But with them any legislation will likely be only marginally destructive rather than utterly destructive as it will be under the Demunists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bangpath.com/2010/02/17/why-does-america-ignore-the-obvious-problem-with-entitlements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watch CNBC? Switch to Fox Business Channel Instead</title>
		<link>http://www.bangpath.com/2009/09/14/watch-cnbc-switch-to-fox-business-channel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bangpath.com/2009/09/14/watch-cnbc-switch-to-fox-business-channel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>t0mmy berg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bangpath.com/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a full time market participant, I have been accustomed to keeping CNBC on next to me all day long.  I don&#8217;t any more.  Read this article which suggests that General Electric CEO Jeff Immelt has put pressure on the network to be less critical of President Obama,  I believe he has.  There is much [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a full time market participant, I have been accustomed to keeping CNBC on next to me all day long.  I don&#8217;t any more.  Read <a title="CNBC Goes Left" href="http://www.nypost.com/p/pagesix/cnbc_sweats_obama_bashing_yeEdcC4ZvjlobYZZpNPKlM">this article</a> which suggests that General Electric CEO Jeff Immelt has put pressure on the network to be less critical of President Obama,  I believe he has.  There is much more pro-Obama speech there now.  Anchors now defend the insane health care legislation.  That was what clinched it for me.  Mark Haines started snorting derisively about those who speak of &#8216;death panels&#8217;.  Mark, I bet you have not read the work of Ezekiel Emmanuel (Obama&#8217;s health care advisor and member of the Comparative Effectiveness Research board authorized and funded in the 2009 &#8216;Stimulus&#8217; package) , have you.  Read it and then tell me that Death Panels is too strong a word for what Demunists are trying to do.</p>
<p>To be honest, I do still watch it until 9AM Central.  The Fox Business News host in the morning is just awful.  I miss Rick Santelli and Larry Kudlow and Art Cashin, but you cannot have everything I suppose.</p>
<p>Why would Jeff Immelt put the screws to his business media outlet?  Well, it could have something to do with all the green energy work that GE is going to get from the government.  That will mean GE sells a lot of wind turbines.  <a title="Immelt is a bad man" href="http://www.nationalcenter.org/PR-GE_SEC_080509.html">In exchange for becoming an Obama supporter</a>, Immelt got a seat on the Economic Recovery Advisory Board and the promise of fat government contracts for the &#8220;Smart Grid&#8217; and green energy projects.  And GE needs it to stay afloat.  I puke when the GE commercials touting the smart grid come on, you know, the ones with the scarecrow suggesting the Wizard of Oz?  And what about the commercials where the &#8216;GE Employees&#8217; sing awful 80&#8217;s movie soundtrack tunes.  My God those are painful.  Those commercials are &#8216;paid for&#8217; by US tax dollars.  GE Capital was a major <a title="GE gets federal help" href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2281779/posts">recipient of federal bailout funds</a> under the &#8216;Stimulus Plan&#8217; and TARP (actually the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program).  While that probably made some sense, because the commercial paper markets were dead, it still reeks because in advertising for all this feel-good green energy work they are doing they are recycling dollars they will earn from supporting the outrageous cap-and-trade legislation which will bring our country to its knees and result in massive government intervention into the everyday lives of Americans.</p>
<p>Switch to Fox Business Channel and do not buy GE appliances or anything else made by GE or its subsidiaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bangpath.com/2009/09/14/watch-cnbc-switch-to-fox-business-channel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pelosi Calls The Kettle Black, and Un-American To Boot</title>
		<link>http://www.bangpath.com/2009/08/12/pelosi-calls-the-kettle-black-and-un-american-to-boot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bangpath.com/2009/08/12/pelosi-calls-the-kettle-black-and-un-american-to-boot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>t0mmy berg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bangpath.com/?p=174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is rather rich to hear Pelosi and Hoyer call those who are shouting down their congressional representatives and others at Town Hall meetings Un-American.  Those with by far the worse reputation for shouting down those with whom they disagree tend to be liberals, especially campus liberals.  They do what they can to stop those [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is rather rich to hear Pelosi and Hoyer call those who are shouting down their congressional representatives and others at Town Hall meetings Un-American.  Those with by far the worse reputation for shouting down those with whom they disagree tend to be liberals, especially campus liberals.  They do what they can to stop those with whom they disagree from appearing in the first place, and failing that, even at really fine institutions like Columbia University, they just shout them out.</p>
<p>The paranoid left believes the recent protests are orchestrated, when they clearly are mostly not orchestrated.  They profess to wonder why we cannot have a rational debate.  The president bemoans the fact that there is so much misleading information and gosh-darned erroneous rhetoric out there;  please just report it to us when you see it.</p>
<p>What you do not see in the press is any acknowledgment of WHY reasoned debate is pretty much impossible, on either side.  Talking to a member of Congress or the Administration is like talking to a brick wall.  They show up with canned and irrelevant politic-speak.  They are not really going to listen to you or take account of your views or even think, much less actually READ the history changing legislation on which they are casting votes.  They, almost without exception, speak from a talking point sheet composed by their leadership.  In other words, it is all bullshit.  And then Claire McCaskill (D-MO) asks, apparently in all seriousness, &#8220;Don&#8217;t you trust me?&#8221;  Bwah ha ha ha ha ha ha (tears rolling down cheek and falling heavily to the floor).  You have got to be kidding.</p>
<p>It is no wonder then that the only reasonable approach to changing the outcome is just to shout the loudest.  Just say No, No, No or some other slogan that can be chanted over, and over, and over&#8230;.  Pelosi and her ilk have only themselves to blame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bangpath.com/2009/08/12/pelosi-calls-the-kettle-black-and-un-american-to-boot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Says No Free Lunch, Then Gives Out Free Lunch</title>
		<link>http://www.bangpath.com/2009/07/16/obama-says-no-free-lunch-then-gives-out-free-lunch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bangpath.com/2009/07/16/obama-says-no-free-lunch-then-gives-out-free-lunch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>t0mmy berg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bangpath.com/?p=170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As reported here, Barack Obama, the man currently pretending to be the President of the United States of America, said when discussing his insane nationalization of the health care system that will bankrupt the country while simultaneously reducing the quality of care and taking a giant leap toward a country like the one presented in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As <a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/07162009/news/regionalnews/dem_health_rx_a_poion_pill_in_ny_179525.htm">reported here</a>, Barack Obama, the man currently pretending to be the President of the United States of America, said when discussing his insane nationalization of the health care system that will bankrupt the country while simultaneously reducing the quality of care and taking a giant leap toward a country like the one presented in the movie Logan&#8217;s Run : &#8220;The American people have to realize that there&#8217;s no such thing as a free lunch.&#8221;</p>
<p>Coming from the leader of the Frree Lunch party that is pretty rich.  Under Obama&#8217;s leadership, the number of taxpayers that pay no income tax will breach 50% for the first time.  Yet many of those 50% that pay no taxes whatsoever will benefit from the programs, like nationalized health care, that Obama proposes.  Is that not the quintessential definition of a free lunch?  Obama&#8217;s slickness is starting to make slick Willie look positively tacky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bangpath.com/2009/07/16/obama-says-no-free-lunch-then-gives-out-free-lunch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America, Meet Your Fascist Overlords</title>
		<link>http://www.bangpath.com/2009/07/02/america-meet-your-fascist-overlords/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bangpath.com/2009/07/02/america-meet-your-fascist-overlords/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>t0mmy berg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Competitiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bangpath.com/?p=155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[






Antichrist&#8217;s Adjutant: Henry Waxman
Dumb as a Rock, but just as dangerous when thrown at your head &#8211; 3rd in line for the Presidency, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi



These are two of the most powerful Demunists and Commocrats in Washington, Waxman, Chair of the House Energy Committe, and Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives.  Waxman [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" width="50%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:center;padding-right:21px"><img class="size-full wp-image-154" title="waxman" src="http://www.bangpath.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/waxman.jpg" alt="Antichrist's Adjutant: Henry Waxman" width="268" height="297" /></td>
<td style="text-align:center;vertical-align:bottom"><img class="size-full wp-image-157" title="pelosi" src="http://www.bangpath.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/pelosi1.jpeg" alt="Dumb as a Rock" width="122" height="85" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:center">Antichrist&#8217;s Adjutant: Henry Waxman</td>
<td style="text-align:center">Dumb as a Rock, but just as dangerous when thrown at your head &#8211; 3rd in line for the Presidency, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>These are two of the most powerful Demunists and Commocrats in Washington, Waxman, Chair of the House Energy Committe, and Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives.  Waxman is from Beverly Hills, 90210 country, California.  Pelosi is from San Francisco.  Obviously their state is governed so well, that we should use it as a pattern for the country.  Oh, wait, their state issues IOUs to pay people that banks will not even accept.  Their state is bankrupt as a result of Demunistic and Commocratic, stars in your eyes,, blinders-on, incapable of thinking of the consequences  mismanagement.</p>
<p>Here is the language of Obama&#8217;s chief political advisor, David Axelrod:  “Ultimately, this is not about a process.  It’s about results.”  In other words, in words reminiscent of Stalin-era communism, &#8220;The ends justify the means.&#8221;</p>
<p>Or take the language of Nancy Pelosi speaking about the need to reduce carbon output on her spring 2009 trip to China.  &#8220;Every aspect of our lives must be subject to inventory.&#8221;  How do you do that?  You send jackbooted ACORN &#8220;community organizers&#8221; around to gather the GPS coordinates for your home in the process of gathering census data, so they know where you live.</p>
<p>Or take the Cap and Trade bill sponsored by Henry Waxman.  Before you can sell your home, you will have to prove to government auditors that you have made it energy-efficient.  What will they do if you haven&#8217;t?  Maybe fine you?  Maybe take a lien on your home?  I do not know.</p>
<p>I have argued that when fascism comes to America, it will come from the Left, not the Right (see <a title="Liberal Fascism" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_Fascism">Liberal Fascism</a>).  So it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bangpath.com/2009/07/02/america-meet-your-fascist-overlords/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.905 seconds -->
