<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>bangpath &#187; Privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bangpath.com/category/privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bangpath.com</link>
	<description>thoughts for thinking people</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:31:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Reasonable Expectations of Privacy are Endangered</title>
		<link>http://www.bangpath.com/2007/11/12/freedom-is-endangered/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bangpath.com/2007/11/12/freedom-is-endangered/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 05:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>t0mmy berg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bangpath.com/2007/11/12/freedom-is-endangered/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is coming to this.  The government is trying to change cultural expectations relating to privacy.  This story is all over, but I originally saw it on Slashdot here.  I was watching Fahrenheit 451 on television last week.  In it a government fearful of allowing people to read things not controlled [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is coming to this.  The government is trying to change cultural expectations relating to privacy.  This story is all over, but I originally saw it on Slashdot <a title="I have nothing to hide.  Gdoy, gdoy." href="http://politics.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/11/11/204231">here</a>.  I was watching Fahrenheit 451 on television last week.  In it a government fearful of allowing people to read things not controlled by it orders all books to be burned.  Governors frequently feel the need to control what is said in society for fear that ideas may inflame passions of people in ways that afflict the power of the governor.  This is taken to ridiculous heights in places like China and Russia and, alarmingly, an increasing number of places around the world.  Of course a prerequisite to being able to control what is said and what ideas are exchanged, is to know what is said.  Unfortunately, the same technologies that made enabled communication to spread in the 1990s, resulting in an increase of freedoms around the world, also make it easier for governors to tap into the idea stream.    If AT&#038;T really is collecting everything that goes across its wires for review by government automatons, this is a step toward the government being able to control speech.  It is only a matter of time before this capability is misused.  It is an attribute of statism.  Statism is a prerequisite of authoritarianism.  It must not be allowed.  Where it is allowed, it must be subject to review.  Perhaps telecommunications companies should not be held accountable for the cost of improper usage of what passes over their wires by government authorities, but someone has to be held accountable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bangpath.com/2007/11/12/freedom-is-endangered/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Signposts on the way to a &#8216;Brave New World&#8217;?</title>
		<link>http://www.bangpath.com/2007/10/10/signposts-on-the-way-to-a-brave-new-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bangpath.com/2007/10/10/signposts-on-the-way-to-a-brave-new-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>t0mmy berg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bangpath.com/2007/10/10/signposts-on-the-way-to-a-brave-new-world/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently opened a brokerage account for a trust I manage.  One of the things that the government is trying to do to combat global terrorism is to require financial intermediaries to &#8220;know thy customer&#8221;.  This in itself makes us less free than we were before.  It is a trade-off we must [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently opened a brokerage account for a trust I manage.  One of the things that the government is trying to do to combat global terrorism is to require financial intermediaries to &#8220;know thy customer&#8221;.  This in itself makes us less free than we were before.  It is a trade-off we must make, and as long as it isn&#8217;t taken too far, is probably an acceptable trade-off between freedom and safety.</p>
<p>But as part of opneing the account I was presented with a choice, either to furnish acceptable photo identification (presumably a state drivers license or a passport, that gets into a whole other thorny debate regarding the Real ID Act) or to answer some questions to which &#8220;only you know the answer&#8221;.  So I was presented with the following questions which I have redacted to protect the &#8216;innocent&#8217;:</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img id="image50" alt="Unbelievable Questions" src="http://www.bangpath.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/privacy_Brokerage_issue.gif" /></p>
<p>Note that the only thing I have given them is a name, a social security number and an address.  They obviously have a service from some company like Intellius (very scary company) that then allows them to formulate questions about other people one knows and one&#8217;s family members.  In the first question they ask where my sister lives or owns property.  Then they ask a dummy question about cars one has recently leased or owned, none of which appear in the list.  Then another dummy question about someone I do not know.  And finally it asks in what month my Mother&#8217;s birthday is.</p>
<p>The unsettling thing to me is that if a private company has access to this information, the government certainly has an even better database.  Which means they can and probably do put together a &#8220;file&#8221; on every person in the country.   Is that really the kind of society we want to be?  It reminds me of the scarier aspects of authoritarian and statist polities in our past.  While it doesn&#8217;t make that big a difference in the current context, what if this was used by an employer to screen for my religious affiliation, for instance.  It allows private actors to quietly discriminate and public actors to pre-scan citizens for surveillance given the probabilities that a certain files profile will be involved in certain proscribed activites, whether they ought to be proscribed or not.  A step toward the &#8220;Surveillance Society&#8221;.</p>
<p>It also means individuals essentially need to manage their public identities in ways that they did not need to consider formerly.  It complicates the living of life in an unpleasant way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bangpath.com/2007/10/10/signposts-on-the-way-to-a-brave-new-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.377 seconds -->
